Creates a taxonomy of 55 types of web accessibility issues across perceivability, operability, understandability, robustness. Evaluates detection and auto‑repair tools: detection tools cover just 56% of issue types; repair tools only 23%. Highlights gaps and tool limitations.
Analyzes 1,000,000 of the most influential homepages globally. Reports an average of 51 distinct accessibility errors per page, a 10 % decrease from 2024, yet underscores ongoing usability impacts from unresolved WCAG-level defects.
Demonstrates a new real‑time DOM‑based system using language models to automatically correct accessibility violations. Achieves over 51% reduction in detected WCAG issues. Shows promise for LLM‑based automated fixes.
Analyses over 430,000 page elements (100K ads) and shows that third‑party ads introduce significant accessibility violations (67% of sites affected). Even compliant ads often contain misleading alt text or privacy-invasive events. Suggests design guidelines for developers and ad platforms.
Proposes a multidimensional evaluation framework for complex web platforms. Finds that many automated tools struggle with nuanced accessibility issues in complex environments, underscoring need for richer metrics and tools.
A review that maps accessibility barriers across disabilities (visual, cognitive, motor). Highlights systemic design gaps in e‑systems and their varied impact, advocating inclusive design strategies.
Open‑access paper explaining how adherence to accessibility standards (e.g. WCAG) improves overall usability for all users, not just users with disabilities. Traces evolution of accessibility guidelines and their impact on UX.
Evaluates accessibility variance across education board websites handling high‑stakes exams. Underscores inconsistencies in WCAG compliance and their potential impact on users during critical interactions.
Investigates how Swiss public administration translates accessibility legislation into practical usability. Identifies barriers such as fragmented enforcement and limited technical capacity, then proposes an “Inclusive Public Administration Framework” integrating WCAG with project‑management practices for consistent implementation.
Uses quantitative and qualitative methods—including user surveys and ANOVA analysis across multiple government websites—to identify common obstacles (e.g. alt‑text quality, poor navigation, language support). Offers evidence‑based recommendations for improving task completion and satisfaction on public‑sector portals.